Orthodontics

    The article discusses a study that compared the clinical outcomes of Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapies in adult patients with severe deep overbite. The study included 50 patients in each group and found that both treatments were effective in correcting overbite, but Invisalign may be preferable for patients with high angle and deep overbite.     The study also found significant differences in two postcephalometric linear measurements between the two groups. However, the study had a retrospective design, and the results should be viewed with caution. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapy in treating patients with a severe deep overbite.     The study included 100 adult patients with a severe deep overbite, with 50 patients receiving Invisalign therapy and 50 patients receiving conventional fixed appliance therapy. The study found that both treatments were effective in correcting overbite, but Invisalig

     if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻         This article discusses a case report of a 15-year-old girl with a convex profile and retrognathic chin who underwent non-extraction orthodontic treatment using temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs) and visual treatment objectives (VTOs).     The treatment plan was presented to the patient and her parents using computer-generated VTOs, which allowed them to visualize the expected outcome of the treatment. The treatment objectives were achieved, and the patient's facial profile and occlusion were significantly improved.    The post-treatment records showed acceptable root parallelism, and there were no significant signs of bone or root resorption. The patient had a stable occlusion at the 12-month retention examination. The article highlights the use of TSADs in orthodontic treatment, which has become increasingly popular in recent years. These d

   if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻      Orthodontic treatment is a common procedure used to correct misaligned teeth and improve the overall appearance of the mouth. One of the challenges of orthodontic treatment is maintaining proper anchorage, or the ability to keep certain teeth in place while others are being moved. In this study, researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different fixed appliance systems in maintaining maxillary first molar anchorage during orthodontic treatment.    The study included 74 orthodontic patients who had undergone bilateral maxillary premolar extractions. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 0.018-inch or a 0.022-inch slot MBT bracket system.    The maxillary first molars were used as the anchor teeth, and the researchers measured the amount of anchorage loss in each group over the course of treatment. The results of the study showed t

     if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻   Orthodontic treatment often involves the extraction of teeth to create space for proper alignment. However, closing the extraction spaces can be challenging, and different techniques have been developed to achieve this goal. This study compared two such techniques: en masse retraction (ER) and two-step retraction (TSR).  En masse retraction involves moving all the teeth in the extraction space as a single unit, while two-step retraction involves moving the posterior teeth first and then the anterior teeth. The study aimed to determine which technique was more effective in closing extraction spaces in adult patients.   The study found that both ER and TSR were effective in closing extraction spaces, with no significant differences in the amount of incisor retraction or anchorage loss of molars between the two methods. However, both methods resulted in some movem

   if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻 Introduction Orthodontic treatment involves the use of braces or other orthodontic appliances to correct malocclusion or misalignment of teeth and jaws. Lingual orthodontics is a type of orthodontic treatment that involves the placement of braces or other orthodontic appliances on the inside surface of the teeth. While lingual orthodontics can be an effective treatment option for patients seeking a discreet orthodontic treatment, it poses significant risks to orthodontists. This paper will examine the dangers of lingual orthodontics for orthodontists. Dangers of Lingual Orthodontics for Orthodontists Lingual orthodontics poses several dangers to orthodontists due to the placement of the orthodontic appliances on the inside surface of the teeth. The following are some of the dangers of lingual orthodontics for orthodontists: Difficulty in Placement and Adjustment

     if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻 Biography about the Pioneers in Quality Management 1.      What was Juran’s primary focus in quality management process?   a.       End Product. b.      Quality Cost. c.       Human Dimensions . d.      Time management.   2.      Which of the following is not considered in Quality Cost Management?   a.       Cost of failures. b.      Cost of prevention. c.       Cost of appraisal. d.      Cost of production.   3.      Which of the following pioneers developed the fishbone diagram?   a.       Genichi Tahuchi. b.      Kaoru Ishikawa. c.       Shigeo Shingo. d.      Taiichi Ohno. 1.      Which of the following pioneers contributed to the Toyota Production System?   a.       Taiichi Ohno. b.      Armand Feigenbaum. c.       Shigeo Shingo. d.      a & c.   2.      Which of the following is not related to the Ju