Unlocking the Power of 3D Printing with CHITUBOX

    if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/     👈🏻 In Collaboration with the amazing orthodontist Dr Seif El Din Hegab by unlocking the Power of 3D Printing with CHITUBOX : Speed and Simplicity in Model Preparation As the world of 3D printing continues to evolve, having the right tools at your disposal can make all the difference. One such tool that stands out in the realm of resin printing is ChiTuBox. Why Choose ChiTuBox? User -Friendly Interface: ChiTuBox is designed with simplicity in mind. Its clean and intuitive interface allows both beginners and experienced users to navigate effortlessly, making model preparation a breeze. Speedy Slicing: Time is of the essence in any production environment. ChiTuBox excels in slicing speed, allowing you to convert your 3D models into print-ready files in a fraction of the time compared to other slicers. This efficiency means you can spend less ...

Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction (Summary)

 



  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings

https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/   👈🏻


  Orthodontic treatment often involves the extraction of teeth to create space for proper alignment. However, closing the extraction spaces can be challenging, and different techniques have been developed to achieve this goal. This study compared two such techniques: en masse retraction (ER) and two-step retraction (TSR).

 En masse retraction involves moving all the teeth in the extraction space as a single unit, while two-step retraction involves moving the posterior teeth first and then the anterior teeth. The study aimed to determine which technique was more effective in closing extraction spaces in adult patients. 

 The study found that both ER and TSR were effective in closing extraction spaces, with no significant differences in the amount of incisor retraction or anchorage loss of molars between the two methods. However, both methods resulted in some movement of the posterior segment, and incisors moved more than molars during space closure. 

 The study challenges the belief that TSR is more effective in preventing anchorage loss and suggests that using ER should be considered for closing extraction spaces unless anterior crowding is present. Additional anchorage reinforcement may be required if more retraction of the anterior teeth is needed. The study also found that changes in incisor and molar tipping were similar, with the crowns showing more movement than the apex. This finding suggests that clinicians should be aware of the potential for crown tipping during space closure and take steps to minimize it. 

 Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different techniques for closing extraction spaces in orthodontic treatment. Clinicians can use this information to make informed decisions about which technique to use based on the specific needs of each patient.t.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Class II division 2 Malocclusion in Orthodontics

Arch wire sequencing in Orthdontics

The Concept of the Straight Wire Appliance in Orthodontics