Orthodontic aligners treatment: Designing Problems

-
  Design 1 1. Segmentation Problems : The treatment plan exhibited significant segmentation issues. 2. Alignment & Leveling Woes : There were noticeable problems with the alignment and leveling of the upper anterior teeth. This was particularly evident in both the occlusal and submento-vertex views, indicating a need for better planning and execution. 3. Inadequate Arch Shape : The arch shape deviated from the ideal U-shape, which could negatively impact the patient's bite and overall function. This aspect requires immediate attention to ensure proper occlusion. 4. Attachment Issues : The positioning and thickness of attachments were inadequate, particularly on the upper left canine, where the doctor specifically requested no attachment placement. This could lead to ineffective tooth movement and discomfort for the patient. 5. Class III Elastic Mismanagement : The use of Class III elastics on the left side for over three months was a significant oversight. This prolonged applic...
Post a Comment

Comparison of anterior retraction and anchorage control between en masse retraction and two-step retraction (Summary)

-

 



  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings

https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/   👈🏻


  Orthodontic treatment often involves the extraction of teeth to create space for proper alignment. However, closing the extraction spaces can be challenging, and different techniques have been developed to achieve this goal. This study compared two such techniques: en masse retraction (ER) and two-step retraction (TSR).

 En masse retraction involves moving all the teeth in the extraction space as a single unit, while two-step retraction involves moving the posterior teeth first and then the anterior teeth. The study aimed to determine which technique was more effective in closing extraction spaces in adult patients. 

 The study found that both ER and TSR were effective in closing extraction spaces, with no significant differences in the amount of incisor retraction or anchorage loss of molars between the two methods. However, both methods resulted in some movement of the posterior segment, and incisors moved more than molars during space closure. 

 The study challenges the belief that TSR is more effective in preventing anchorage loss and suggests that using ER should be considered for closing extraction spaces unless anterior crowding is present. Additional anchorage reinforcement may be required if more retraction of the anterior teeth is needed. The study also found that changes in incisor and molar tipping were similar, with the crowns showing more movement than the apex. This finding suggests that clinicians should be aware of the potential for crown tipping during space closure and take steps to minimize it. 

 Overall, the study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different techniques for closing extraction spaces in orthodontic treatment. Clinicians can use this information to make informed decisions about which technique to use based on the specific needs of each patient.t.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Arch wire sequencing in Orthdontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/       👈🏻 Arch sequencing depends on : 1-   Archwire Types 2-   Archwire Functions 3-   Archwire Sequencing according to cases (where different situations requires sequences ) 4-   Pain associated with Archwire placement and activation  INTRODUCTION        A successful orthodontic therapy depends not only on manual skills and knowledge of treatment steps but also on knowledge and choice of materials used. One of the major components of fixed orthodontic therapy is the choice of wires. Orthodontic wires are defined as devices comprising a wire conforming to the alveolar or dental arch, which is used as an anchorage for correcting irregularities in the position of teeth . Therefore, the aim of the this assignment   was to focus on the differences in the features of wires as well a...
Read more

Class II division 2 Malocclusion in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 Class II Division 2 (definition) : Acc. To Angle’s Classification It is when the buccal groove of the 1 st Mandibular molar occludes distal to mesio-buccal cusp of 1 st maxillary molar with retroclination of maxillary central incisors. Acc. To British Standards classification (Incisor relationship) The lower incisors edgs occlude posteriorly to the   cingulum plateau of the upper incisors &   the lower centrals are retruded (due to lack of stops) Sub-types Type A : Maxillary centrals and      laterals are retroclined. Type B : Maxillary Laterals overlapping the retroclined centrals . Type C : Maxillary centrals and laterals areretroclined and are overlapped by max. canines.   Criteria Extra Oral features : - Shape of head : Brachycephalic - Facial Profile : Convex...
Read more

The Concept of the Straight Wire Appliance in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 The occlusion research (study of the non-orthodontic normals) had been launched to get a better understanding of occlusion and how it was related to the buccolabial surfaces of the crowns. There was no intention originally to produce a new appliance, but the need for one became evident.       The arising concept was to Pre-program suitable treatment into the appliance and therefore the SWA was developed. The built-in features of the SWA guide the teeth along direct vector lines, eliminating jiggling, round-tripping and other excessive movements. Andrews’s philosophy of treatment     A bracket type for each tooth type:       Since within any dentition, teeth differ from each other, therefore, each tooth would require its own bracket.    Measurements of the non-orthodo...
Read more