Orthodontic aligners treatment: Designing Problems

-
  Design 1 1. Segmentation Problems : The treatment plan exhibited significant segmentation issues. 2. Alignment & Leveling Woes : There were noticeable problems with the alignment and leveling of the upper anterior teeth. This was particularly evident in both the occlusal and submento-vertex views, indicating a need for better planning and execution. 3. Inadequate Arch Shape : The arch shape deviated from the ideal U-shape, which could negatively impact the patient's bite and overall function. This aspect requires immediate attention to ensure proper occlusion. 4. Attachment Issues : The positioning and thickness of attachments were inadequate, particularly on the upper left canine, where the doctor specifically requested no attachment placement. This could lead to ineffective tooth movement and discomfort for the patient. 5. Class III Elastic Mismanagement : The use of Class III elastics on the left side for over three months was a significant oversight. This prolonged applic...
Post a Comment

Does anchorage loss differ with 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot bracket systems? (symmery)

-




  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings

https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/   👈🏻    


Orthodontic treatment is a common procedure used to correct misaligned teeth and improve the overall appearance of the mouth. One of the challenges of orthodontic treatment is maintaining proper anchorage, or the ability to keep certain teeth in place while others are being moved. In this study, researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different fixed appliance systems in maintaining maxillary first molar anchorage during orthodontic treatment. 

  The study included 74 orthodontic patients who had undergone bilateral maxillary premolar extractions. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 0.018-inch or a 0.022-inch slot MBT bracket system. 

  The maxillary first molars were used as the anchor teeth, and the researchers measured the amount of anchorage loss in each group over the course of treatment. The results of the study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of maxillary first molar anchorage loss. This suggests that both the 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot fixed appliance systems are equally effective in maintaining anchorage during orthodontic treatment. 

  The data were analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance, which is a statistical method used to compare the means of two or more groups. This allowed the researchers to determine whether there was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of anchorage loss. The findings of this study have important implications for orthodontic treatment. By showing that both the 0.018-inch and 0.022-inch slot fixed appliance systems are equally effective in maintaining anchorage, orthodontists can choose the system that best suits their patients' needs without worrying about compromising treatment outcomes. It is important to note that this study only looked at maxillary first molar anchorage loss and did not take into account other factors that may affect treatment outcomes, such as patient compliance and the severity of the malocclusion. 

  Further research is needed to determine whether these factors play a role in the effectiveness of different fixed appliance systems. Overall, this study provides valuable information for orthodontists and patients alike. By understanding the effectiveness of different fixed appliance systems in maintaining anchorage, orthodontists can make more informed decisions about treatment options, and patients can feel confident that their treatment is being carried out using the most effective methods available.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Class II division 2 Malocclusion in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 Class II Division 2 (definition) : Acc. To Angle’s Classification It is when the buccal groove of the 1 st Mandibular molar occludes distal to mesio-buccal cusp of 1 st maxillary molar with retroclination of maxillary central incisors. Acc. To British Standards classification (Incisor relationship) The lower incisors edgs occlude posteriorly to the   cingulum plateau of the upper incisors &   the lower centrals are retruded (due to lack of stops) Sub-types Type A : Maxillary centrals and      laterals are retroclined. Type B : Maxillary Laterals overlapping the retroclined centrals . Type C : Maxillary centrals and laterals areretroclined and are overlapped by max. canines.   Criteria Extra Oral features : - Shape of head : Brachycephalic - Facial Profile : Convex...
Read more

Arch wire sequencing in Orthdontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/       👈🏻 Arch sequencing depends on : 1-   Archwire Types 2-   Archwire Functions 3-   Archwire Sequencing according to cases (where different situations requires sequences ) 4-   Pain associated with Archwire placement and activation  INTRODUCTION        A successful orthodontic therapy depends not only on manual skills and knowledge of treatment steps but also on knowledge and choice of materials used. One of the major components of fixed orthodontic therapy is the choice of wires. Orthodontic wires are defined as devices comprising a wire conforming to the alveolar or dental arch, which is used as an anchorage for correcting irregularities in the position of teeth . Therefore, the aim of the this assignment   was to focus on the differences in the features of wires as well a...
Read more

The Concept of the Straight Wire Appliance in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 The occlusion research (study of the non-orthodontic normals) had been launched to get a better understanding of occlusion and how it was related to the buccolabial surfaces of the crowns. There was no intention originally to produce a new appliance, but the need for one became evident.       The arising concept was to Pre-program suitable treatment into the appliance and therefore the SWA was developed. The built-in features of the SWA guide the teeth along direct vector lines, eliminating jiggling, round-tripping and other excessive movements. Andrews’s philosophy of treatment     A bracket type for each tooth type:       Since within any dentition, teeth differ from each other, therefore, each tooth would require its own bracket.    Measurements of the non-orthodo...
Read more