Orthodontic aligners treatment: Designing Problems

  Design 1 1. Segmentation Problems : The treatment plan exhibited significant segmentation issues. 2. Alignment & Leveling Woes : There were noticeable problems with the alignment and leveling of the upper anterior teeth. This was particularly evident in both the occlusal and submento-vertex views, indicating a need for better planning and execution. 3. Inadequate Arch Shape : The arch shape deviated from the ideal U-shape, which could negatively impact the patient's bite and overall function. This aspect requires immediate attention to ensure proper occlusion. 4. Attachment Issues : The positioning and thickness of attachments were inadequate, particularly on the upper left canine, where the doctor specifically requested no attachment placement. This could lead to ineffective tooth movement and discomfort for the patient. 5. Class III Elastic Mismanagement : The use of Class III elastics on the left side for over three months was a significant oversight. This prolonged applic...

Comparison of clinical outcomes between Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapies in adult patients with severe deep overbite treated with nonextraction (summery)





    The article discusses a study that compared the clinical outcomes of Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapies in adult patients with severe deep overbite. The study included 50 patients in each group and found that both treatments were effective in correcting overbite, but Invisalign may be preferable for patients with high angle and deep overbite. 

   The study also found significant differences in two postcephalometric linear measurements between the two groups. However, the study had a retrospective design, and the results should be viewed with caution. The study aimed to compare the effectiveness of Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapy in treating patients with a severe deep overbite. 

   The study included 100 adult patients with a severe deep overbite, with 50 patients receiving Invisalign therapy and 50 patients receiving conventional fixed appliance therapy. The study found that both treatments were effective in correcting overbite, but Invisalign may be preferable for patients with high angle and deep overbite.
  
   The study also found significant differences in two postcephalometric linear measurements between the two groups. The first measurement was the mandibular plane angle, which was significantly reduced in the Invisalign group compared to the conventional fixed appliance group. The second measurement was the lower anterior facial height, which was significantly increased in the Invisalign group compared to the conventional fixed appliance group. 

   However, the study had a retrospective design, which means that the data was collected from past medical records. This type of study design has limitations, such as the inability to control for confounding variables and the potential for bias.

   Therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. The study's findings suggest that Invisalign therapy may have some advantages over conventional fixed appliance therapy in treating patients with a severe deep overbite. Invisalign therapy may be preferable for patients with high angle and deep overbite, as it can reduce the mandibular plane angle and increase the lower anterior facial height. However, further research is needed to confirm the findings and explore the potential advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option. 

   The article also discusses various studies related to orthodontic treatment, including the use of Invisalign appliances for overbite management, the stability of deep-bite correction, and the time efficiency of aligner therapy compared to conventional braces. The studies utilize statistical methods and tools such as the PAR Index and R programming language.
 
   In conclusion, the study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of Invisalign and conventional fixed appliance therapy in treating patients with a severe deep overbite. The study found that both treatments were effective in correcting overbite, but Invisalign may be preferable for patients with high angle and deep overbite. However, the study had a retrospective design, which means that the data was collected from past medical records. 

  Therefore, the results should be viewed with caution. Further research is needed to confirm the findings and explore the potential advantages and disadvantages of each treatment option. Orthodontists should consider the individual needs and preferences of each patient when selecting the most appropriate treatment approach.
   


if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings

https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/   👈🏻

Comments

  1. Great paper could you summerize the conclusion . Thank you in advance

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Class II division 2 Malocclusion in Orthodontics

Arch wire sequencing in Orthdontics

The Concept of the Straight Wire Appliance in Orthodontics