Orthodontic aligners treatment: Designing Problems

-
  Design 1 1. Segmentation Problems : The treatment plan exhibited significant segmentation issues. 2. Alignment & Leveling Woes : There were noticeable problems with the alignment and leveling of the upper anterior teeth. This was particularly evident in both the occlusal and submento-vertex views, indicating a need for better planning and execution. 3. Inadequate Arch Shape : The arch shape deviated from the ideal U-shape, which could negatively impact the patient's bite and overall function. This aspect requires immediate attention to ensure proper occlusion. 4. Attachment Issues : The positioning and thickness of attachments were inadequate, particularly on the upper left canine, where the doctor specifically requested no attachment placement. This could lead to ineffective tooth movement and discomfort for the patient. 5. Class III Elastic Mismanagement : The use of Class III elastics on the left side for over three months was a significant oversight. This prolonged applic...
Post a Comment

Treatment of Class III Malocclusion and Anterior Crossbite with Aligners: A Case Report (Summary)

-

 


    Introduction:

    Class III malocclusion is a common dental issue that affects the alignment of the teeth and jaws. It is characterized by the lower jaw protruding forward, causing the lower teeth to overlap the upper teeth. Anterior crossbite is another dental issue that occurs when the upper front teeth are positioned behind the lower front teeth.
    Both of these issues can cause discomfort, difficulty chewing, and aesthetic concerns. Traditional orthodontic treatments for these issues involve the use of braces, but aligners have become an increasingly popular alternative due to their convenience and effectiveness.
    This case report aims to demonstrate the successful use of aligners for correcting Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite.

    Methods:

    The patient in this case report was a 23-year-old female with Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite. She was treated with clear aligners over a period of 18 months. The aligners were custom-made using 3D digital models of the patient's teeth and jaws.
    The treatment plan involved a series of aligners that were worn for two weeks each, gradually shifting the teeth into the desired position. The patient was monitored regularly throughout the treatment process to ensure that the aligners were working effectively.

    Results:

    The aligner treatment was successful in correcting the patient's Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite. The patient reported no discomfort or pain during the treatment process.
    The aligners were easy to wear and did not interfere with the patient's daily activities. The treatment took a total of 18 months to achieve the desired results. The patient was satisfied with the outcome of the treatment and reported improved aesthetics and functionality of her teeth.

    Discussion:

    The use of aligners for correcting Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite has become increasingly popular in recent years. Aligners offer several advantages over traditional braces, including improved aesthetics, convenience, and comfort.
    Aligners are also effective in correcting mild to moderate dental issues, such as Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite. This case report demonstrates the successful use of aligners for correcting these issues in a patient. The aligner treatment was effective, comfortable, and convenient for the patient.
    The treatment took a total of 18 months, which is comparable to the time required for traditional orthodontic treatments.

    Conclusion:

    Aligners are a viable alternative to traditional braces for correcting Class III malocclusion and anterior crossbite. This case report demonstrates the successful use of aligners for correcting

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Class II division 2 Malocclusion in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 Class II Division 2 (definition) : Acc. To Angle’s Classification It is when the buccal groove of the 1 st Mandibular molar occludes distal to mesio-buccal cusp of 1 st maxillary molar with retroclination of maxillary central incisors. Acc. To British Standards classification (Incisor relationship) The lower incisors edgs occlude posteriorly to the   cingulum plateau of the upper incisors &   the lower centrals are retruded (due to lack of stops) Sub-types Type A : Maxillary centrals and      laterals are retroclined. Type B : Maxillary Laterals overlapping the retroclined centrals . Type C : Maxillary centrals and laterals areretroclined and are overlapped by max. canines.   Criteria Extra Oral features : - Shape of head : Brachycephalic - Facial Profile : Convex...
Read more

Arch wire sequencing in Orthdontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/       👈🏻 Arch sequencing depends on : 1-   Archwire Types 2-   Archwire Functions 3-   Archwire Sequencing according to cases (where different situations requires sequences ) 4-   Pain associated with Archwire placement and activation  INTRODUCTION        A successful orthodontic therapy depends not only on manual skills and knowledge of treatment steps but also on knowledge and choice of materials used. One of the major components of fixed orthodontic therapy is the choice of wires. Orthodontic wires are defined as devices comprising a wire conforming to the alveolar or dental arch, which is used as an anchorage for correcting irregularities in the position of teeth . Therefore, the aim of the this assignment   was to focus on the differences in the features of wires as well a...
Read more

The Concept of the Straight Wire Appliance in Orthodontics

-
Image
  if you are intersted in this article please follow for more readings https://myorthodonticsblogg.blogspot.com/        👈🏻 The occlusion research (study of the non-orthodontic normals) had been launched to get a better understanding of occlusion and how it was related to the buccolabial surfaces of the crowns. There was no intention originally to produce a new appliance, but the need for one became evident.       The arising concept was to Pre-program suitable treatment into the appliance and therefore the SWA was developed. The built-in features of the SWA guide the teeth along direct vector lines, eliminating jiggling, round-tripping and other excessive movements. Andrews’s philosophy of treatment     A bracket type for each tooth type:       Since within any dentition, teeth differ from each other, therefore, each tooth would require its own bracket.    Measurements of the non-orthodo...
Read more